Is True

They said the theme of the play was abstract; its message careless and crude. Its ideological inclination was somewhat reckless and rude. A masquerade dancing, panting and chanting in view of a depiction of you. They said the quality of work was mediocre at best and provoked a provocative mood. They said the pride of the pride was undermined by a scheming and marginalized few. And the few had proved to be a prominent nuisance and a truly destabilizing tool.

The policy of Kalashnikovs camouflaged in rose bushes is debated over a meal of poison and beef. The gunboat diplomacy of wayyy before now was not that way before now. But the ways of before and the way that is now are characteristically in sync, how? Probably the benign mind of the brain dead bureaucrat who is speculated to be allergic to the concept of "eureka" and opposed to the suggestion that creativity might birth progress.

They say the play was in bad taste; an opportunity gone to waste; a saturation of vulgarity that should be banned in a haste. In view of the chronic scarcity of free and accepted men, beings that were raised in shackles have made and defined this den; A masquerade dancing, panting and chanting while from this rejected view, that masquerade is rejected; but true.